Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Middle Africa
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,358
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
223rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,440,269 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.273. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.292% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 292.2 Immigrants from Middle Africa.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 21.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $91,293, a difference of 11.1%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $77,559, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $49,201, a difference of 2.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $82,254, a difference of 5.6%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $43,416, a difference of 6.8%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $39,529 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $93,593 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $77,559 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $43,416 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $49,201 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $37,965 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $47,916 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $82,254 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $91,293 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $58,375 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 28.5%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 21.2%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.3%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 22.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 14.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 19.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 18.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 19.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 22.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 30.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Fair 11.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 12.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 17.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Poor 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 67.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 12.2%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.5%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.88%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.0%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 3.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 61.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 41.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 43.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 34.9% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 29.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 21.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Good 10.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Good 89.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 53.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 41.9%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 27.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.33%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.69%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 94.2% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 92.9% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 90.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 88.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 84.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Poor 63.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Poor 58.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Poor 44.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Fair 36.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.9% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 62.1%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 45.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.43%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.2%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 24.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Good 47.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |