Latvian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,178,385 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.576. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.154% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 154.4 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $39,529, a difference of 33.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $82,254, a difference of 32.4%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $49,201, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $47,916, a difference of 10.2%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $58,375, a difference of 15.3%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $37,965, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 44.5%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 43.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.18%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 46.2%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 26.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.7%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.52%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 55.9%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 48.5%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.90%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 17.6%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.18%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.5%).