Pima vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,547,174 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 17.5 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $39,529, a difference of 29.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $91,293, a difference of 24.4%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $77,559, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $82,254, a difference of 0.69%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $37,965, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 111.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 97.8%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 81.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 5.9%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 27.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 28.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 145.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 106.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 102.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 17.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 67.7%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 47.3%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (65.9% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 38.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 2.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 57.8%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 57.7%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.30%), 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 60.0%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 52.1%), and ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.7%).