Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Lithuanians
Immigrants from Middle Africa
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,358
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
223rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa Integration in Lithuanian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,600,354 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.620. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.271% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 271.4 Immigrants from Middle Africa.
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 28.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,223 compared to $82,254, a difference of 27.9%), and per capita income ($49,448 compared to $39,529, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,108 compared to $37,965, a difference of 10.9%), householder income over 65 years ($65,209 compared to $58,375, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $47,916, a difference of 11.8%).
Income Metric | Lithuanian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,448 | Tragic $39,529 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $115,395 | Tragic $93,593 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,852 | Tragic $77,559 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,991 | Tragic $43,416 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,228 | Tragic $49,201 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,108 | Tragic $37,965 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,552 | Tragic $47,916 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,223 | Tragic $82,254 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $112,484 | Tragic $91,293 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,209 | Tragic $58,375 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.7% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 41.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 40.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.5%), single father poverty (17.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 10.5%), and single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 10.7%).
Poverty Metric | Lithuanian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 10.1% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.7% | Tragic 22.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 14.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 19.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.0% | Tragic 18.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Tragic 19.2% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 22.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.3% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Tragic 30.3% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.0% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Fair 11.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Good 12.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 19.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.7%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Lithuanian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 17.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.5% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.8% | Tragic 8.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Poor 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.93%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.40%).
Labor Participation Metric | Lithuanian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Exceptional 67.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.4% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.0% | Exceptional 76.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.8% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.6% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 42.1%), births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 18.2%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 3.5%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.8%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 5.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Lithuanian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Family Households | Fair 64.0% | Tragic 61.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.9% | Tragic 41.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.10 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.0% | Tragic 43.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.6% | Tragic 34.9% |
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 20.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Lithuanian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.4% | Good 10.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.7% | Good 89.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.2% | Tragic 53.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 67.3%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 28.0%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
Education Level Metric | Lithuanian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.4% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Tragic 95.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 94.2% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Tragic 92.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Tragic 91.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 90.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Tragic 88.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.9% | Tragic 84.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.8% | Poor 63.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.9% | Poor 58.0% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.6% | Poor 44.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.2% | Fair 36.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.4% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Good 1.9% |
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.8%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.3%), and cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.51%), female disability (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.87%).
Disability Metric | Lithuanian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Disability | Poor 11.9% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 11.6% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Average 12.2% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Excellent 10.8% | Tragic 12.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.4% | Tragic 24.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Good 47.1% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.3% | Tragic 18.6% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |