Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,298,125 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.958. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.831% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 831.0 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $39,529, a difference of 40.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,010 compared to $82,254, a difference of 36.2%), and median male earnings ($65,406 compared to $49,201, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $47,916, a difference of 11.9%), median female earnings ($44,774 compared to $37,965, a difference of 17.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,722 compared to $58,375, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 39.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 34.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 3.0%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 23.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 44.1%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 22.5%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.5% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 0.98%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.7%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.5%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.65%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 59.3%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 51.4%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.72%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 20.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 15.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.7%), male disability (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 4.4%).