Turkish vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,368,916 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.067% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 66.7 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,318 compared to $82,254, a difference of 34.1%), per capita income ($52,391 compared to $39,529, a difference of 32.5%), and median male earnings ($64,253 compared to $49,201, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $47,916, a difference of 13.3%), householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $58,375, a difference of 16.6%), and median female earnings ($44,695 compared to $37,965, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 42.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 40.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.78%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 41.0%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 27.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (63.6% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.57%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 47.6%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 40.9%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 24.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.4%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.0%).