Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGuatemalaGuyanaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tsimshian

Immigrants from Middle Africa

Average
Fair
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,358
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
223rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Middle Africa Integration in Tsimshian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 12,487,818 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.315% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 315.3 Immigrants from Middle Africa.
Tsimshian Integration in Immigrants from Middle Africa Communities

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $82,254, a difference of 18.9%), householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $47,916, a difference of 14.1%), and median family income ($101,543 compared to $93,593, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,202 compared to $58,375, a difference of 0.30%), median earnings ($43,695 compared to $43,416, a difference of 0.64%), and median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $49,201, a difference of 0.75%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Income
Income MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Middle Africa
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,344
Tragic
$39,529
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,543
Tragic
$93,593
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,346
Tragic
$77,559
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,695
Tragic
$43,416
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,836
Tragic
$49,201
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,530
Tragic
$37,965
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,649
Tragic
$47,916
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,809
Tragic
$82,254
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,783
Tragic
$91,293
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,202
Tragic
$58,375
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.9%
Exceptional
22.4%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 67.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 35.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.67%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 4.1%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Poverty
Poverty MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Middle Africa
Poverty
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Good
8.8%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Good
13.1%
Tragic
15.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Tragic
22.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
19.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
19.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
22.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.8%
Tragic
30.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
12.9%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 160.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 72.3%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 54.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Middle Africa
Unemployment
Tragic
7.2%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.5%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
18.0%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.0%
Average
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
13.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
8.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.4%
Poor
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Tragic
5.8%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Middle Africa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Exceptional
67.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.4%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Exceptional
76.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
88.7%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.4%
Exceptional
83.3%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.5%), births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 20.6%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.070%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.4%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Middle Africa
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
61.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Tragic
41.8%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.7%
Tragic
43.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.2%
Tragic
34.9%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 18.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 6.1%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Middle Africa
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Good
89.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Tragic
53.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 45.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 34.6%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (57.9% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 0.060%), college, under 1 year (64.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and nursery school (98.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Education Level
Education Level MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Middle Africa
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.9%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
95.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Tragic
95.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
94.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Tragic
92.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.9%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Tragic
88.0%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Tragic
84.4%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.3%
Poor
63.9%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.9%
Poor
58.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Poor
44.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Fair
36.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Good
1.9%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 100.4%), hearing disability (4.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 70.3%), and ambulatory disability (8.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.7%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.0%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Disability
Disability MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Middle Africa
Disability
Tragic
16.1%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
15.6%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.4%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.9%
Tragic
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
59.2%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%