Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,982,863 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.162% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to an increase of 162.3 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,569 compared to $39,529, a difference of 17.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,824 compared to $82,254, a difference of 17.7%), and median family income ($108,251 compared to $93,593, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income over 65 years ($64,989 compared to $58,375, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $47,916, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 21.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 19.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 19.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (82.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 0.88%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.0%), births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 17.1%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.44%), family households (61.2% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 0.58%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.20%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.2%), and master's degree (18.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 14.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.74%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 3.6%).