Hmong vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hmong

Immigrants from Middle Africa

Average
Fair
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,358
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
223rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Middle Africa Integration in Hmong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,474,818 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.669. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.754% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 753.8 Immigrants from Middle Africa.
Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Middle Africa Communities

Hmong vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 23.8%), median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $37,965, a difference of 7.0%), and per capita income ($38,120 compared to $39,529, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $49,201, a difference of 2.0%), median household income ($75,839 compared to $77,559, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,258 compared to $82,254, a difference of 2.4%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Income
Income MetricHmongImmigrants from Middle Africa
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,120
Tragic
$39,529
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,296
Tragic
$93,593
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,839
Tragic
$77,559
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,111
Tragic
$43,416
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,254
Tragic
$49,201
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,498
Tragic
$37,965
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,364
Tragic
$47,916
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,258
Tragic
$82,254
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,115
Tragic
$91,293
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,339
Tragic
$58,375
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
22.4%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 18.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 13.8%), and single male poverty (14.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.89%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 3.0%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Poverty
Poverty MetricHmongImmigrants from Middle Africa
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Average
9.1%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Fair
13.9%
Tragic
15.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.0%
Tragic
22.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
19.7%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
19.2%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Tragic
22.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Tragic
30.3%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
12.9%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 65.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.9%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHmongImmigrants from Middle Africa
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Average
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
8.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Poor
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.8%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHmongImmigrants from Middle Africa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Exceptional
67.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Exceptional
76.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
83.3%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 26.0%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.0%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.9%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHmongImmigrants from Middle Africa
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
61.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Tragic
41.8%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Tragic
43.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Tragic
34.9%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 15.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.26%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 8.2%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHmongImmigrants from Middle Africa
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Good
89.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
53.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
5.8%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.4%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.5%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.46%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Education Level
Education Level MetricHmongImmigrants from Middle Africa
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Good
98.1%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.4%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Tragic
95.1%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Tragic
94.2%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
92.9%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Tragic
88.0%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Tragic
84.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.5%
Poor
63.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Poor
58.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.4%
Poor
44.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.8%
Fair
36.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.4%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Good
1.9%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 16.3%), and male disability (12.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.71%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.0%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Disability
Disability MetricHmongImmigrants from Middle Africa
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
18.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%