Norwegian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,474,873 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 5.2 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 29.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,866 compared to $82,254, a difference of 17.8%), and median male earnings ($55,965 compared to $49,201, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $37,965, a difference of 2.2%), householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $58,375, a difference of 4.7%), and median earnings ($46,865 compared to $43,416, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (6.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 47.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 46.8%), and married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.6%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 31.7%), female unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.7%), and unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 41.3%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 19.1%), and married-couple households (49.5% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.3%), family households (63.9% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 58.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 38.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 17.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 30.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 78.4%), college, under 1 year (68.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and associate's degree (47.6% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.37%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 39.4%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.6%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.17%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.1%).