Swiss vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 185,544,011 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to an increase of 15.9 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 34.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,511 compared to $82,254, a difference of 16.1%), and median male earnings ($55,731 compared to $49,201, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $37,965, a difference of 0.16%), householder income over 65 years ($61,621 compared to $58,375, a difference of 5.6%), and median earnings ($46,315 compared to $43,416, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 33.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 31.6%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 2.1%), single female poverty (21.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.1%), female unemployment (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 37.2%), married-couple households (49.9% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 19.5%), and currently married (49.7% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (65.2% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.0%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 29.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 57.4%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.95%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.96%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 35.7%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.3%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.1%).