Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Lithuania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Lithuania

Immigrants from Middle Africa

Exceptional
Fair
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,358
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
223rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Middle Africa Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,530,071 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 54.8 Immigrants from Middle Africa.
Immigrants from Lithuania Integration in Immigrants from Middle Africa Communities

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,149 compared to $82,254, a difference of 31.5%), per capita income ($51,361 compared to $39,529, a difference of 29.9%), and median male earnings ($63,346 compared to $49,201, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $58,375, a difference of 13.2%), median female earnings ($43,317 compared to $37,965, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $47,916, a difference of 14.8%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Middle Africa
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,361
Tragic
$39,529
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$118,053
Tragic
$93,593
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$96,836
Tragic
$77,559
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,769
Tragic
$43,416
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,346
Tragic
$49,201
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,317
Tragic
$37,965
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,028
Tragic
$47,916
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,149
Tragic
$82,254
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$114,336
Tragic
$91,293
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,087
Tragic
$58,375
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.6%
Exceptional
22.4%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (12.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 47.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 46.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.2%), single male poverty (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.0%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Middle Africa
Poverty
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.4%
Tragic
22.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
14.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
19.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Tragic
19.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.8%
Tragic
22.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.2%
Tragic
30.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.9%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.4%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Middle Africa
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Average
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Tragic
8.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Poor
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.56%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Middle Africa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
67.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.2%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Exceptional
76.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Exceptional
83.3%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 47.1%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 32.0%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.1%), family households (63.9% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Middle Africa
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Tragic
61.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.6%
Tragic
41.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Tragic
43.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Tragic
34.9%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 4.5%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.42%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Middle Africa
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Good
89.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.8%
Tragic
53.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 42.3%), professional degree (5.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 32.6%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.72%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.73%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.73%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Middle Africa
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Tragic
94.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
92.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.1%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Tragic
88.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
84.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Poor
63.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Poor
58.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.4%
Poor
44.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.6%
Fair
36.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.6%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 24.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.1%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Middle Africa
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Good
11.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.5%
Tragic
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.9%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
18.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%