Argentinean vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,851,975 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.254. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to a decrease of 19.4 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $39,529, a difference of 26.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,111 compared to $82,254, a difference of 25.4%), and median male earnings ($60,117 compared to $49,201, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,952 compared to $37,965, a difference of 10.5%), householder income over 65 years ($65,246 compared to $58,375, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $47,916, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 31.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 30.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.93%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 19.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 32.1%), births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 16.5%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.75%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (65.0% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 40.9%), master's degree (18.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 24.5%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 27.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 20.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.93%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%).