Portuguese vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 187,546,129 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.312. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to a decrease of 2.3 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 22.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,429 compared to $82,254, a difference of 20.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,309 compared to $91,293, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,440 compared to $58,375, a difference of 5.2%), median female earnings ($40,177 compared to $37,965, a difference of 5.8%), and median earnings ($48,032 compared to $43,416, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 26.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 25.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 25.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.0%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 14.3%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.68%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 8.0%), and master's degree (13.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.1% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.24%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 34.3%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.15%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.5% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 2.6%).