Immigrants vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,731,449 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to an increase of 0.9 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,423 compared to $82,254, a difference of 14.8%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,201 compared to $47,916, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $58,375, a difference of 2.2%), median female earnings ($39,328 compared to $37,965, a difference of 3.6%), and median earnings ($46,478 compared to $43,416, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 15.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.32%), receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.88%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.8%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 10.8%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.2%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.20%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.0%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (36.7% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 0.33%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.75%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.80%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.5%).