Guyanese vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,387,475 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Guyanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.195. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guyanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guyanese corresponds to a decrease of 18.7 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 22.2%), householder income under 25 years ($55,210 compared to $47,916, a difference of 15.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,940 compared to $82,254, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($93,373 compared to $93,593, a difference of 0.23%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,966 compared to $91,293, a difference of 0.36%), and median male earnings ($50,613 compared to $49,201, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 33.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 30.4%), and receiving food stamps (16.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.030%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.59%), and single male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 45.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 45.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.2% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.5%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 0.68%), married-couple households (41.4% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 188.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 66.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.8% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 26.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 51.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 59.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.1%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.3%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 25.7%), hearing disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.34%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.52%).