Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Immigrants from Middle Africa
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,358
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
223rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 161,852,743 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.242. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.070% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 70.3 Immigrants from Middle Africa.
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 26.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $82,254, a difference of 15.6%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $49,201, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $37,965, a difference of 2.0%), householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $58,375, a difference of 3.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $47,916, a difference of 6.9%).
Income Metric | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,806 | Tragic $39,529 |
Median Family Income | Average $103,273 | Tragic $93,593 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,965 | Tragic $77,559 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,658 | Tragic $43,416 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,382 | Tragic $49,201 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,738 | Tragic $37,965 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,224 | Tragic $47,916 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,070 | Tragic $82,254 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,387 | Tragic $91,293 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,581 | Tragic $58,375 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 26.2%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 2.0%), single female poverty (21.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.4%).
Poverty Metric | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 10.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 20.0% | Tragic 22.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 14.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.8% | Tragic 19.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 18.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 19.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Tragic 22.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Tragic 30.3% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Fair 11.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.9% | Good 12.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 12.9% |
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Exceptional 17.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Tragic 8.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Poor 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.38%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.3% | Exceptional 67.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.9% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.5% | Exceptional 76.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Exceptional 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.2%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 16.1%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.2%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Family Households | Excellent 64.6% | Tragic 61.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 41.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Tragic 43.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.3% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.0% | Tragic 34.9% |
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 19.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Good 10.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Good 89.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Tragic 53.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 48.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.050%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.84%).
Education Level Metric | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 95.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 94.2% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.1% | Tragic 92.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Tragic 91.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 90.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 88.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.4% | Tragic 84.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.8% | Poor 63.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Poor 58.0% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.0% | Poor 44.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Fair 36.6% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.5% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Good 1.9% |
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.6%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 25.7%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.94%), and disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Disability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 12.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.0% | Tragic 24.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.6% | Good 47.1% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 18.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |