Immigrants from Laos vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,213,157 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.336. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.064% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to a decrease of 64.3 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $71,021, a difference of 25.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,909 compared to $105,149, a difference of 15.7%), and median household income ($78,327 compared to $89,919, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $38,461, a difference of 4.4%), median earnings ($42,884 compared to $45,027, a difference of 5.0%), and median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $52,306, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 22.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 22.8%), and family poverty (10.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.1%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.52%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 25.2%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.6%), and married-couple households (45.1% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 0.88%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.43, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (65.3% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 21.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 11.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.67%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 99.0%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 15.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and female disability (12.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.1%).