Immigrants from Australia vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,063,639 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.640. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.821% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 2,820.9 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $41,017, a difference of 41.3%), median male earnings ($67,634 compared to $52,306, a difference of 29.3%), and median earnings ($56,305 compared to $45,027, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $71,021, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $55,158, a difference of 2.7%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 40.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 21.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.090%), female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 28.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.2%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.3%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 79.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 61.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 38.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 81.5%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 77.2%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 70.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.9% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.060%), 11th grade (94.0% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and 9th grade (95.8% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.7%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 6.3%).