Tsimshian vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,353,560 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.653. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 6.4 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($58,202 compared to $71,021, a difference of 22.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,783 compared to $105,149, a difference of 8.6%), and median household income ($83,346 compared to $89,919, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $55,158, a difference of 0.93%), per capita income ($40,344 compared to $41,017, a difference of 1.7%), and median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $38,461, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 59.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 34.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.6%), single female poverty (19.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and female poverty (13.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 132.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 69.5%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 22.9%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.8%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.41%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 0.74%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 52.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 30.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 19.6%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 15.5%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.9% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.27%), nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 79.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 51.8%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.2%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.0%).