Immigrants from Bahamas vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,527,927 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Bahamas communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.198. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bahamas within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.061% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bahamas corresponds to an increase of 61.4 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,174 compared to $71,021, a difference of 33.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,177 compared to $105,149, a difference of 26.4%), and median household income ($71,349 compared to $89,919, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,027 compared to $38,461, a difference of 9.8%), per capita income ($37,193 compared to $41,017, a difference of 10.3%), and median earnings ($39,861 compared to $45,027, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 43.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 40.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 9.3%), single female poverty (22.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 12.8%), and single male poverty (14.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 30.5%), divorced or separated (13.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 19.0%), and married-couple households (41.7% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.7%), family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.43, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 78.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 43.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 17.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 41.1%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (33.3% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 0.27%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 0.51%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 27.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.5%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.15%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.56%).