Immigrants from Cabo Verde vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,962,135 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Cabo Verde communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.376. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cabo Verde within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cabo Verde corresponds to a decrease of 13.5 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($46,654 compared to $71,021, a difference of 52.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,542 compared to $105,149, a difference of 25.9%), and median household income ($73,515 compared to $89,919, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,208 compared to $38,461, a difference of 0.66%), median earnings ($43,963 compared to $45,027, a difference of 2.4%), and median male earnings ($50,009 compared to $52,306, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (23.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 85.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 83.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 72.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.1%), single father poverty (17.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and single male poverty (13.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 51.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 47.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.7% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 19.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 56.5%), married-couple households (36.2% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 35.5%), and currently married (37.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.74%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.43, a difference of 7.0%), and family households (61.9% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (3.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 146.5%), no vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 139.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 83.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (81.6% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 13.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (43.3% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 41.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 83.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 123.2%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 23.2%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (96.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 36.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 25.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.7%), ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age over 75 (52.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 8.4%).