Immigrants from Austria vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,914,083 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Austria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.460. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Austria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.329% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Austria corresponds to an increase of 329.1 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,503 compared to $41,017, a difference of 28.0%), median male earnings ($62,164 compared to $52,306, a difference of 18.9%), and median earnings ($51,826 compared to $45,027, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($68,208 compared to $71,021, a difference of 4.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,400 compared to $55,158, a difference of 5.3%), and median household income ($95,277 compared to $89,919, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 35.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.17%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.6%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 19.5%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.3%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 55.4%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 32.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 32.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 58.3%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 54.3%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.020%), 8th grade (96.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and 9th grade (96.0% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 13.5%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 12.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.73%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%).