Scottish vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 330,019,530 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.168% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 168.4 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,735 compared to $71,021, a difference of 15.0%), wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 14.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $55,158, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $38,461, a difference of 0.17%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,622 compared to $95,058, a difference of 0.46%), and median family income ($104,288 compared to $104,910, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 29.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 16.7%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.18%), female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 20.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.11 compared to 3.43, a difference of 10.4%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.0% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 0.19%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (49.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 26.1%), no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 0.28%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 25.4%), master's degree (15.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 23.6%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 22.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.51%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.3%).