Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Native Hawaiian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Native Hawaiians
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,131
SOCIAL INDEX
58.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
162nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Native Hawaiian Integration in Immigrants from South Central Asia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 258,897,542 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.045. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Native Hawaiians.
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Native Hawaiian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $52,306, a difference of 31.8%), per capita income ($52,660 compared to $41,017, a difference of 28.4%), and median earnings ($57,114 compared to $45,027, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $71,021, a difference of 1.3%), householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $55,158, a difference of 4.8%), and wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 15.3%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Native Hawaiian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,660 | Tragic $41,017 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,956 | Good $104,910 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $106,057 | Exceptional $89,919 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $57,114 | Poor $45,027 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $68,960 | Poor $52,306 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,324 | Tragic $38,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,818 | Exceptional $55,158 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $116,626 | Average $95,058 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $124,188 | Exceptional $105,149 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $70,103 | Exceptional $71,021 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.3% | Good 25.4% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Native Hawaiian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 45.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 22.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.4%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Native Hawaiian |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Males | Exceptional 9.3% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.6% | Exceptional 17.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Excellent 15.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 17.8% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 25.3% | Excellent 28.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 8.8% | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Native Hawaiian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 30.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Native Hawaiian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 18.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 8.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.3% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Native Hawaiian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Native Hawaiian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.6% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.0% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Tragic 82.3% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Native Hawaiian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 39.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 27.0%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 3.0%), married-couple households (50.6% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and currently married (50.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Native Hawaiian |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 68.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 30.0% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.6% | Exceptional 49.1% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.43 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.4% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 50.0% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Tragic 34.3% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Native Hawaiian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 53.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 29.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Native Hawaiian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.5% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.6% | Exceptional 61.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Exceptional 24.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Native Hawaiian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (20.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 68.8%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 66.3%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and 11th grade (93.6% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.33%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Native Hawaiian |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Good 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Good 97.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Good 97.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Exceptional 96.9% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Exceptional 90.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.4% | Exceptional 87.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 72.1% | Poor 63.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 57.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.7% | Tragic 43.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.3% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.7% | Tragic 12.3% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 3.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.6% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Native Hawaiian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 42.8%), male disability (9.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 32.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.3%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Native Hawaiian |
Disability | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 12.5% |
Males | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 12.5% |
Females | Exceptional 10.5% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.9% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.6% | Tragic 24.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.0% | Tragic 48.3% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |