Immigrants from Portugal vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,339,989 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.064. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 5.1 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $71,021, a difference of 27.0%), median household income ($84,740 compared to $89,919, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,203 compared to $105,149, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,512 compared to $95,058, a difference of 0.48%), householder income under 25 years ($54,105 compared to $55,158, a difference of 1.9%), and per capita income ($42,412 compared to $41,017, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 38.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 28.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and male poverty (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 25.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.4%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.43, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.0%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (65.2% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 53.2%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 52.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 33.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 68.6%), college, 1 year or more (51.9% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 11.1%), and college, under 1 year (57.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 33.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.9%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.28%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.5%).