Tohono O'odham vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,299,485 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 13.2 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($61,663 compared to $89,919, a difference of 45.8%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $104,910, a difference of 45.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $71,021, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 14.8%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $38,461, a difference of 15.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $55,158, a difference of 21.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 145.3%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 142.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 121.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 39.9%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 51.3%), and receiving food stamps (21.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 67.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 83.3%), male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 80.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 70.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 19.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 13.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 53.2%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 49.2%), and births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 103.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 41.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 9.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 22.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 32.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 46.1%), bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 36.0%), and associate's degree (31.8% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 62.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 49.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.5%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.3%).