Aleut vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,528,192 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Aleut communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.668. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Aleuts within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.377% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Aleuts corresponds to an increase of 377.1 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Aleut and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,708 compared to $71,021, a difference of 13.3%), householder income under 25 years ($50,377 compared to $55,158, a difference of 9.5%), and median household income ($83,446 compared to $89,919, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,719 compared to $38,461, a difference of 0.67%), median earnings ($44,241 compared to $45,027, a difference of 1.8%), and median male earnings ($51,168 compared to $52,306, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Aleut and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (25.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 27.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 25.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.3%), receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Aleut and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 50.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 36.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Aleut and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Aleut and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.0%), births to unmarried women (39.3% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 14.7%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.050%), currently married (46.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.43, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 69.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 36.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Aleut and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (39.6% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 8.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and bachelor's degree (31.3% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and 9th grade (96.0% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 18.6%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.1%).