Immigrants vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,827,211 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.347. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to a decrease of 5.2 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $71,021, a difference of 19.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,943 compared to $105,149, a difference of 5.2%), and per capita income ($43,010 compared to $41,017, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,423 compared to $95,058, a difference of 0.67%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and median female earnings ($39,328 compared to $38,461, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 38.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 31.9%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.33%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.8%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.78%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.43, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 51.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 38.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 24.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 76.2%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (57.0% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.9%), male disability (10.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 15.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.37%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.73%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.4%).