Scotch-Irish vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,447,069 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Scotch-Irish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.565. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scotch-Irish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.279% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scotch-Irish corresponds to an increase of 279.3 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,447 compared to $71,021, a difference of 19.5%), householder income under 25 years ($49,039 compared to $55,158, a difference of 12.5%), and wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($44,924 compared to $45,027, a difference of 0.23%), median male earnings ($53,658 compared to $52,306, a difference of 2.6%), and median female earnings ($37,383 compared to $38,461, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 21.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 20.9%), and single father poverty (18.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and family poverty (8.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.4%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.43, a difference of 10.4%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.2%), married-couple households (48.3% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (48.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 26.6%), no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 0.76%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.94%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 18.7%), master's degree (14.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 17.3%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.040%), high school diploma (90.8% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 27.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.4% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.1%).