Immigrants from Cuba vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,520,027 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.321. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 2.7 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $71,021, a difference of 58.8%), median family income ($78,249 compared to $104,910, a difference of 34.1%), and median household income ($68,461 compared to $89,919, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $55,158, a difference of 9.5%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 13.8%), and median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $38,461, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 97.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 90.6%), and receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 62.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.5%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 31.5%), male unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 23.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 30.4%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.0%), and births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.2% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 0.26%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.43, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 65.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 33.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 78.2%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 34.4%), and college, under 1 year (55.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.68%).