Immigrants from Western Asia vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 277,583,013 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Western Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.373. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Asia corresponds to a decrease of 5.7 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,876 compared to $41,017, a difference of 14.3%), householder income over 65 years ($62,645 compared to $71,021, a difference of 13.4%), and median male earnings ($58,131 compared to $52,306, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($90,005 compared to $89,919, a difference of 0.10%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,217 compared to $105,149, a difference of 1.0%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 28.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 28.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.020%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.57%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.48%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 26.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.1%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.6%), currently married (46.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 58.3%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 43.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 35.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 48.2%), master's degree (17.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 42.3%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.83%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.8%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 21.7%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.70%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.2%).