French American Indian vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,582,588 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.227% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 227.2 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,699 compared to $71,021, a difference of 29.8%), median household income ($76,387 compared to $89,919, a difference of 17.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,811 compared to $105,149, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.29%), per capita income ($40,244 compared to $41,017, a difference of 1.9%), and median male earnings ($50,611 compared to $52,306, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 29.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 27.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.1%), single father poverty (17.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and single mother poverty (33.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 13.1%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and married-couple households (44.1% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 37.6%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 35.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 33.5%), master's degree (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 0.19%), bachelor's degree (33.1% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 0.47%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 2.2%).