Jordanian vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,574,068 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.046% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to an increase of 45.9 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($58,500 compared to $52,306, a difference of 11.8%), per capita income ($45,605 compared to $41,017, a difference of 11.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,313 compared to $71,021, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($91,794 compared to $89,919, a difference of 2.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,376 compared to $105,149, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,186 compared to $95,058, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 26.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.95%), female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 20.3%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.43, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.24%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 42.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 23.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 34.5%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 26.8%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.2% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 0.37%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.6%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.52%), and disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 5.0%).