Norwegian vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,109,672 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 5.3 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $71,021, a difference of 16.2%), wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 13.8%), and per capita income ($44,480 compared to $41,017, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $38,461, a difference of 0.89%), median family income ($106,144 compared to $104,910, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $105,149, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 43.1%), married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 24.6%), and family poverty (6.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.19%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 34.3%), unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 27.5%), and male unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 23.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 16.9%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and average family size (3.08 compared to 3.43, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.22%), married-couple households (49.5% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 0.86%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 17.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 16.3%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 24.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.6%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.060%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.5%).