Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 255,387,064 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Eastern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Africa corresponds to a decrease of 5.2 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,157 compared to $71,021, a difference of 16.1%), wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,158 compared to $55,158, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($102,451 compared to $104,910, a difference of 2.4%), median male earnings ($53,713 compared to $52,306, a difference of 2.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,458 compared to $95,058, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 20.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 19.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.5%), single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (42.9% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 14.3%), family households (61.1% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.89%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 63.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 38.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 14.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 53.0%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 33.4%), and master's degree (16.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.89%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 32.2%), male disability (10.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 15.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.9%).