Immigrants from Latin America vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 295,851,280 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.630. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to a decrease of 3.3 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,265 compared to $71,021, a difference of 33.3%), median family income ($86,989 compared to $104,910, a difference of 20.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,219 compared to $105,149, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 7.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $55,158, a difference of 7.3%), and median female earnings ($35,307 compared to $38,461, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 55.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 55.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.2%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 29.2%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.8%), and married-couple households (44.7% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.42 compared to 3.43, a difference of 0.13%), family households (67.2% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 34.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 31.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 107.8%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 21.3%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 30.0%), male disability (11.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.5%), female disability (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.5%).