Immigrants from Congo vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,261,199 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 37.4 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $71,021, a difference of 38.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $105,149, a difference of 35.1%), and median household income ($66,768 compared to $89,919, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $38,461, a difference of 12.1%), per capita income ($35,720 compared to $41,017, a difference of 14.8%), and median earnings ($39,169 compared to $45,027, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 48.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 47.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (22.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.2%), single male poverty (13.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.83%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 32.6%), married-couple households (39.0% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 25.8%), and currently married (41.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.38%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.43, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 78.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 46.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 51.0%), ged/equivalency (83.1% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 0.83%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 27.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 25.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.81%), female disability (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.0%).