Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,515,338 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Saudi Arabia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Saudi Arabia corresponds to an increase of 8.1 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($46,187 compared to $55,158, a difference of 19.4%), per capita income ($46,008 compared to $41,017, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,355 compared to $71,021, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,249 compared to $105,149, a difference of 0.090%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,450 compared to $95,058, a difference of 0.41%), and median family income ($108,544 compared to $104,910, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 41.5%), receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 21.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.1%), births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 18.0%), and family households (60.7% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.8%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 67.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 38.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 69.5%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 56.0%), and master's degree (19.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.7% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.11%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.5% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and 11th grade (93.7% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.7%), male disability (10.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 20.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.1%).