Immigrants from Asia vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,166,342 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.135. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 4.0 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,741 compared to $41,017, a difference of 21.3%), median male earnings ($63,240 compared to $52,306, a difference of 20.9%), and median earnings ($53,310 compared to $45,027, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $55,158, a difference of 2.2%), householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $71,021, a difference of 5.1%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 29.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 21.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.5%), poverty (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 28.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.6%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.1% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 0.090%), currently married (48.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and family households (66.1% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 41.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 38.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 53.5%), no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 52.8%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 26.7%), and male disability (10.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.48%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.7%).