Immigrants from Belarus vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,126,671 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to a decrease of 6.6 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,303 compared to $41,017, a difference of 22.6%), median male earnings ($62,658 compared to $52,306, a difference of 19.8%), and median earnings ($53,043 compared to $45,027, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,743 compared to $55,158, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and median household income ($94,399 compared to $89,919, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 36.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 25.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.43%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.71%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 34.3%), births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 33.8%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.54%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 117.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 98.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 10.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 28.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 60.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 54.0%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 45.4%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.3% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 0.25%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.2% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 31.6%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 30.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.6%).