Ecuadorian vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Native Hawaiian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ecuadorians
Native Hawaiians
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,131
SOCIAL INDEX
58.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
162nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Native Hawaiian Integration in Ecuadorian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 229,070,338 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.152. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 2.4 Native Hawaiians.
Ecuadorian vs Native Hawaiian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $71,021, a difference of 29.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $105,149, a difference of 12.2%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,214 compared to $45,027, a difference of 0.41%), median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $52,306, a difference of 1.4%), and median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $38,461, a difference of 1.7%).
Income Metric | Ecuadorian | Native Hawaiian |
Per Capita Income | Poor $41,958 | Tragic $41,017 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,114 | Good $104,910 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,070 | Exceptional $89,919 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,214 | Poor $45,027 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,596 | Poor $52,306 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,117 | Tragic $38,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,911 | Exceptional $55,158 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,574 | Average $95,058 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,739 | Exceptional $105,149 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,958 | Exceptional $71,021 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.9% | Good 25.4% |
Ecuadorian vs Native Hawaiian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 56.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 48.9%), and married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.96%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.1%).
Poverty Metric | Ecuadorian | Native Hawaiian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 17.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Excellent 15.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.8% | Excellent 28.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.9% | Tragic 12.8% |
Ecuadorian vs Native Hawaiian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Ecuadorian | Native Hawaiian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 18.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Tragic 8.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.5% | Excellent 5.3% |
Ecuadorian vs Native Hawaiian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 19.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ecuadorian | Native Hawaiian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.4% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.4% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.3% | Tragic 82.3% |
Ecuadorian vs Native Hawaiian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.6%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 13.0%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.50%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 3.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Ecuadorian | Native Hawaiian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Exceptional 68.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.5% | Exceptional 49.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Exceptional 3.43 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.6% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Tragic 34.3% |
Ecuadorian vs Native Hawaiian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 195.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 110.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 77.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 18.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 46.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 77.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ecuadorian | Native Hawaiian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 22.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 77.9% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 42.0% | Exceptional 61.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 24.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Ecuadorian vs Native Hawaiian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 86.7%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 14.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (43.0% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
Education Level Metric | Ecuadorian | Native Hawaiian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Exceptional 96.9% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.6% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.6% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.1% | Exceptional 90.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.7% | Exceptional 87.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Poor 63.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.3% | Tragic 57.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.0% | Tragic 43.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.4% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Tragic 12.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.9% | Tragic 3.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.6% |
Ecuadorian vs Native Hawaiian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 46.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 23.1%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.12%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.0%).
Disability Metric | Ecuadorian | Native Hawaiian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 12.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Tragic 24.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Tragic 48.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Average 17.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |