Asian vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 329,239,265 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.331. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to an increase of 38.5 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,057 compared to $41,017, a difference of 22.0%), median male earnings ($63,827 compared to $52,306, a difference of 22.0%), and median earnings ($53,690 compared to $45,027, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($68,822 compared to $71,021, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $55,158, a difference of 3.3%), and wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 32.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 19.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.64%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty (11.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.22%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.94%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 28.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.8%), and divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.5% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 0.75%), currently married (48.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (66.5% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 33.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 20.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 53.7%), no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 51.6%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.7% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 0.87%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.88%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.7%), male disability (10.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 25.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.24%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.7%).