Bermudan vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,013,155 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Bermudan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.296. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bermudans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.371% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bermudans corresponds to an increase of 370.8 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($58,171 compared to $71,021, a difference of 22.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,359 compared to $55,158, a difference of 16.5%), and median household income ($80,406 compared to $89,919, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,465 compared to $52,306, a difference of 0.30%), median earnings ($45,593 compared to $45,027, a difference of 1.3%), and median female earnings ($39,418 compared to $38,461, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 28.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 26.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.97%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.9%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.2%), and married-couple households (42.4% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 3.6%), family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.43, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 67.1%), no vehicles in household (12.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 66.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.6% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 21.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 40.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 35.7%), master's degree (15.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 25.6%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 0.20%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.89%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.2%).