Immigrants from Fiji vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,284,147 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.209. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.090% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to an increase of 1,089.8 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 13.5%), householder income over 65 years ($64,795 compared to $71,021, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $95,058, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($106,544 compared to $104,910, a difference of 1.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,952 compared to $105,149, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $55,158, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 21.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 20.9%), and single father poverty (13.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 19.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.6% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 17.6%), family households with children (30.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 11.4%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.8% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 0.56%), average family size (3.45 compared to 3.43, a difference of 0.74%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 4.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.26%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 121.6%), high school diploma (85.8% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and ged/equivalency (82.7% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.77%), master's degree (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and college, 1 year or more (56.9% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 46.8%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.2%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.94%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.3%).