Immigrants from Oceania vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 236,938,471 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.379. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.435% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 1,435.2 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $41,017, a difference of 10.2%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $71,021, a difference of 10.2%), and median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $52,306, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.82%), median household income ($89,100 compared to $89,919, a difference of 0.92%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $105,149, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.8%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.86%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 12.2%), family households (64.9% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.5%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 23.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 41.8%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 20.8%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 15.9%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.9%), and male disability (11.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 0.60%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.78%).