Immigrants from Central America vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,902,454 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to an increase of 1.3 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $71,021, a difference of 33.0%), median family income ($85,050 compared to $104,910, a difference of 23.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,965 compared to $105,149, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $55,158, a difference of 8.1%), and median earnings ($39,762 compared to $45,027, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 60.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 48.6%), and family poverty (12.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.8%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.3%), female unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 31.5%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.3%), and family households with children (31.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.3% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 0.14%), average family size (3.49 compared to 3.43, a difference of 1.9%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 128.3%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 33.3%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.2%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 24.9%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.7%).