Laotian vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 185,676,989 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.177% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to a decrease of 177.3 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,041 compared to $41,017, a difference of 14.7%), median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $52,306, a difference of 13.5%), and median earnings ($50,343 compared to $45,027, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $55,158, a difference of 1.5%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $105,149, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 28.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 22.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.85%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 20.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.43, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.98%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 27.2%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 45.9%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 40.4%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 27.5%), male disability (10.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 18.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.96%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.4%).