Australian vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 179,423,554 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.287. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.470% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 470.0 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $41,017, a difference of 27.0%), median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $52,306, a difference of 20.2%), and median earnings ($52,294 compared to $45,027, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $55,158, a difference of 2.6%), householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $71,021, a difference of 6.2%), and median household income ($96,490 compared to $89,919, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 33.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 16.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.2%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 16.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.7%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.66%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 43.2%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 54.7%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 51.6%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 16.5%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.7%).