Immigrants from Japan vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 255,052,977 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Japan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Japan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.562% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Japan corresponds to an increase of 561.8 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,359 compared to $41,017, a difference of 30.1%), median male earnings ($65,518 compared to $52,306, a difference of 25.3%), and median earnings ($54,938 compared to $45,027, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,932 compared to $55,158, a difference of 1.4%), householder income over 65 years ($69,774 compared to $71,021, a difference of 1.8%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 42.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.6%), female poverty (11.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and poverty (11.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.7% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.81%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 29.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.8%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.25%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (47.7% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 49.5%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 48.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 31.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 76.1%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 67.2%), and master's degree (20.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 63.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.8% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.14%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and high school diploma (91.0% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 25.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.1%).